The past year has been one of racial reckoning in the United States, as police shootings of unarmed African Americans sparked protests and the COVID-19 pandemic emphasized inequities in health outcomes by race. With such events, naming racism as a public health crisis seems appropriate. The term will be used in the entirety of the country. And by naming racism as a public health crisis, it will become even more pertinent.
Racism as a public health crisis
Recently, a number of cities and counties have passed resolutions recognizing racism as a public health crisis. This comes on the heels of the murder of Breonna Taylor by police, the global movement for Black lives, and the upcoming 2020 time of racial reckoning. While public health emergencies and disasters point to catastrophic events that affect many people at once, racism is a chronic health problem that requires long-term solutions and a multi-faceted response. Racism should never be seen as something that is not important or that does not exist. It is real and it does exist, maybe worse than it was in several years now.
Acts and passive actions to end racism
A series of declarations, state resolutions, and other initiatives has been introduced to address racism as a public health crisis. In addition, several professional organizations have passed resolutions in this regard. Some of these resolutions acknowledged the history of racism in the United States, denounced police violence, and recognized racism’s role in COVID-19. Others have called on other agencies to do the same.
Integrative approach to public health crisis
An integrative approach to a public health crisis is a framework for addressing a public health crisis that takes the basic interests of the affected community into account. Deadly public health crisis on our roads is a thing. This framework provides both political and moral justification for the assistance provided to affected people. This approach asserts that certain groups’ basic interests are in danger of being compromised by a public health crisis. In addition, it holds that the basic institutions of society should be organized in an equitable manner.
Identifying high-risk members of the community
There are several ways to identify high-risk members of the community during sever public health crises. These populations may vary depending on the type of incident, but are often defined as those with additional needs. These individuals may be in need of assistance maintaining their independence, requiring extra supervision or medical care, or may have limited English proficiency. There are also some populations that may be particularly vulnerable because of their pharmacological dependency.
Identifying interventions that are not necessary to provide effective crisis relief
When it comes to providing crisis relief, you must choose the right interventions based on the context and situation. While an emergency is a life-threatening situation that requires immediate action, a crisis can wait for 24 to 72 hours. A crisis is characterized by a situation that is stressful or difficult to deal with, and it is often not resolved through normal problem-solving methods. That’s why it’s important to select the right interventions and determine their effectiveness.